![]() |
|
|
Resources: Channeling Barclay |
What you do during peer revision is precisely what I do when I grade: both activities are a kind of consulting work in which we point out strengths and weaknesses, offer feedback and advice, and evaluate writing. The big difference is that when you're done consulting, the author has a chance to revise; when I'm done, it ends with a grade. Yet the fact that these activities are so basically similar suggests a few things. For one, it suggests that you should take peer revision as seriously as I take grading. For another, it suggests that the better you become at peer revision, the more you help your classmastes and the more you help yourself. Helping your classmates is pretty obvious, but you might not realize why being an effective peer reviewer can help you with your own work. It's simple--the better you are at peer review, the more you understand what makes a paper strong, the more you can use this understanding to help you with your own paper. The best way to improve your skills with peer revision is to channel me. At this point in the semester, you've seen my comments three times: Rough Draft One, Final Draft One, Final Draft Two. Using that base of experience, you should:
If you give these items some thought, you should be able to channel me nicely, both as you work on others' papers and as you work on your own.
|
| home |